Use case AutomotiveNVH
NVH testing & acoustic validation
BOOK A DEMO 90% faster dataset retrieval
50% fewer repeat tests
100% of configurations linked to test data
NVH is a comparison problem
- NVH teams run structured tests across powertrain, chassis, and body variants in anechoic chambers and on road
- Each configuration produces high-frequency acoustic and vibration data across dozens of channels
- Customer perception targets are compared against measurements across the full development programme
Data is captured, then lost
- NVH data files are large and stored per-test in local or shared drives with inconsistent naming conventions
- Comparing a new suspension calibration against three previous variants means manually locating, loading, and aligning datasets that may span multiple programmes
- Configuration changes (spring rate, bushing spec, tyre compound) are tracked in PLM, not linked to the test data itself
Quix provides searchable NVH data
- Quix captures high-frequency NVH channels and stores them with the full vehicle and component configuration at test time
- Cross-variant and cross-programme comparison is a query, not a file-retrieval exercise
- Live monitoring during a test flags when a channel crosses a threshold, allowing the test plan to adapt in real time
Sign-off without the data hunt
- Engineers find the right historical dataset in minutes; no more scheduling repeat tests to recover a result that was already captured
- Configuration-to-perception correlation across a programme is available without manual data assembly
- Development sign-off cycles are shorter because the evidence base is continuously maintained, not built at the end